剧情介绍
Fernando Pessoa's paradoxical 1922 short story is styled as a Platonic dialogue between a wealthy banker and his colleague, in which the banker explains the strictly logical path that led him step-by-step from an anarchist youth to being the only true and consistent anarchist. The tale playfully undermines many of the founding texts of political 'enlightenment' (Descartes, Hobbes, Locke, Malthus, Rousseau, Smith, Spinoza), as well as making a devastating critique of revolutionary psychology and of 1917 Bolshevism. Like magic, the sleight of hand is transparent, apparently convincing us of the banker's inexorable logic, while the plot challenges us to discover the flaw in the shocking twist of the wealthy banker's logic.
我要评论
登录后参与评论
kylegun
真正的无政府主义只能是孤独个体,只需保证一个人的自由;正因不相信任何体制才能做到不择手段,独裁与暴君依赖集体幻觉而存在……上世纪初的文本现在确实不过时,但舞台戏剧黑白/彩色之类的电影语言有点平庸,太不无政府主义了
回复
举报
2020年12月27日
scMrsAlwyn
我只能说好可怜一个人男的。到最后的最后,他把这些在脑子里想了无数次的逻辑和理由说出来给其他人听的这次,他甚至很难说服自己了。电影从名字上来说就是无解的,对权力等级和不平等的控诉贯穿始终,却始终没有解决办法。我想里面探讨的种种理念本来就是理论上的,要实现都会变样的。
回复
举报
2020年11月25日
太妃糖拿铁
看。。。看不太懂??????
回复
举报
2020年11月25日